I used the jigsaw technique because this is one
of the best tactics to promote interaction among students.
My students seemed to be more involved than
before when solving problems. It makes me wonder if the
characteristics of workshop triggered that. Deci and Ryan’s
Self-Determination Theory suggested that motivation needs three
things: competence, autonomy and relatedness. Competence stems from
the confidence they get in workshop by solving problems together.
Autonomy stems from the independence they develop by being able to
offer their own ideas. Relatedness stems from the encouraging
atmosphere of the group.
Ericka
Deadwyler
Topic: Why is it important for workshop leaders to
prevent the dependence of the use of an answer key? And how can we
promote independent thinking among students?
I chose this topic because it seemed as if it
was a common problem among the students. Also, it was a problem I had
as a freshman. I applied William Perry’s Theory of Intellectual
Development in my workshop by giving the students questions without
the solutions and asking them to come up to the board to explain the
steps they took to solve the particular questions. It tied in to the
workshop model because it allows the workshop leaders to understand
how to help students, and what techniques to use in order to promote
independent thinking.
Tip: Allow students to work in groups and
voice their opinions – the heart of the workshop model!
Sylvia Ebalu
Topic: How can peer leaders help students to
improve their intrinsic motivation?
I wanted to improve my students’ participation
in workshop. When I applied the theories of Deci and Ryan, and Malone
and Lepper, I found out that most of the students were not motivated.
I used cooperative learning, attention, and recognition of students’
efforts. In the workshop we want to get a better way of making
students understand chemistry. If peer leaders use motivation
theories to help students, I feel there would be improvement in
class.
Tip: Be attentive to students;
congratulate them.
Mariya
Gorkhover
Topic: Leaders’ teaching styles and group
dynamics: Determining the most effective approaches
Are the variables (approaches) likely to be
significant towards the effects (stages of group dynamics)? Using
Tuckman and Stetson’s theory of group dynamics, I was able to
concretely identify the stages that my workshop went through and to
know which steps to take to push it towards norming and performing.
Successful group formation, i.e., reaching the performing stage,
would certainly be conducive to improving academic performance and
increasing student satisfaction and retention.
Tips: Use a variety of approaches; make
students do work and help each other, and don’t “babysit” them.
Mengyi He
Topic: How does pairing students of different
standing affect their ability to solve problems?
The workshop is composed of all different
students. Some students learn faster, some learn slower; some are
doing well and some are not doing well. As a result I put them in
pairs to help each other out: I chose this topic because I wanted to
see if pairing students of different standing works during the
workshop. Vygotsky’s theory states that a more knowledgeable other’s
assistance is needed in order to overcome/learn certain concepts or
skills during the process of learning. Since we have some students
who are doing better than others, they can serve as a “MKO” and
provide assistance to their peers.
Tip: Pair a “doing well” student with one
who’s not doing well. The “doing well” student can provide help to
the other student.
Nyimasatta Jawo
Topic: How can students be motivated to
participate in workshop?
To explain how an effective workshop can be
created: I did this by giving students compliments, by making them
feel smart and appreciated. Deci and Ryan’s theory of motivation can
help improve the participation in workshop.
Tip: Make students feel wanted in class
by complimenting the students’ performance and participation.
Ghazala Khokhar
Topic: How can a group get past the forming
stage of development?
I chose this topic because I noticed that many
groups spend hours together every week, for months. Yet they still do
not know each other’s names or feel comfortable with each other. I
tried to encourage students to get to know each other. During the
first meeting I left he class open to discussion so that all students
became acquainted. Workshop success depends on the success of the
group. If a group cannot work together comfortably then how can they
be expected to benefit? I used Tuckman’s four stages of group
development.
Tip: First impressions are important;
never let your students leave early in the first meeting. Leave the
group open for discussion for 15 minutes on the first meeting.
Abhishek Kumar
Topic: How important is it for the peer leader
to recognize the students’ learning styles
(Kolb’s quadrants)?
This topic is important because it allows other
peer leaders to understand the importance of different learning
styles because every student has their own way to see things and
understand the material. This will allow the peer leader to help
students work more efficiently. One student was doing well in the
workshop and didn’t do well on the first test. I asked him what’s the
reason and then I gave him a questionnaire so I could determine which
style is good for him. Then I paired him with students who have the
same learning style and I taught them as they learned more. He
started to understand things and did well on his second test. I used
Kolb’s learning styles theory and this was very useful when applied
to the PLTL workshop: Because of the small number of students, the
leader can recognize and work with students’ learning styles to
enhance the efficiency of the workshop.
Tip: Find out about all four learning
styles (Kolb); apply them to the workshop; use a log of diagrams,
flow charts, models etc. to help visual learners, and non-abstract
learners.
Igor Labutov
Topic: Does age difference between workshop
peers benefit the group’s development?
Towfiq
Majumder
Topic: How do students learn to solve problems
to develop conceptual understanding of a subject?
I chose this topic because the experiment I did
has made a tremendous impact in my group by creating a more
collaborative and motivated group. The theories of Piaget and
Vygotsky reflected on the pair problem-solving method I used. Also it
applies on how workshop is designed to give more attention to
students by redoing the number of students in a group which relates
to Vygotsky’s theory. This ties into the workshop model by making the
students follow the pair problem-solving method. It can be a source
of improvement.
Tip: Always pair your students, depending
on how many students you have. Switch student eats around by pairing
the strong students with the weak ones.
Mary Nnoli
Topic: Does feeling “Mattered” help students as
a team?
I chose this topic because I realized that three
things were missing in my workshop sessions. I used “Mattering and
marginality” (Schlossberg) to make the students understand that each
of them matter in the class. Relationship leadership comes in to
create an atmosphere whereby the students feel free to ask questions,
and the jigsaw technique comes in to build teamwork and social
interactions. This ties in to the PLTL workshop model because one of
the goals is to raise up leaders who will identify problems in the
students that normally the professor will not see and these ideas
help the workshop leader in achieving that.
Tip: Be open-minded to the students;
encourage teamwork; create an atmosphere whereby the students feel
free to ask questions.
Ibrahim Salako
Topic: How can cooperative learning be improved
in the workshop?
I took this topic to show that just pairing
students in the workshop to solve problems doesn’t necessarily
improve the dynamics of knowledge sharing among groups in the
workshop. I chose theories of cooperative learning and elaboration
theory and applied them by trying to take note of students’
performance when they work together in groups of twos and threes in
the workshop. These theories tied to the workshop model because it
clears all the stereotyped views that we have about pairing students
being an automatic ticket for a successful workshop.
Tip: Note the abilities of students in
your workshop and try to make them sit in groups of at least three so
that you will have a smart, intermediate, and a slow student, who can
help each other.
Anthony Tam
Topic: How does the motivation of the workshop
leader affect the motivation of the students?
Thanhhanh (Mimi)
Tran
Topic: What would a peer leader do to balance a
group with various learning styles?
Since I became a peer leader, I realized that
other leaders and I always had the same problem in our workshop: one
exercise in the book might take some students 5 minutes; some other
students need half an hour. Why? The reason is students have
different learning styles which lead to different way of thinking
while solving problems. Our workshop is only 2-hour. How can we make
sure that we can finish on time and also make sure that our students
are not lost. The only answer for this question is finding out their
learning style and make sure that our workshop goes through the whole
four stages of the learning cycle, according to Kolb’s Learning
Styles Inventory.
Every workshop I try to go through the four
stage of the learning cycle as much as I can. In my case, I think my
group only has two styles of learning: assimilators and convergers,
it is easier for me to balance. Basically I just need to help them
answer two questions “what is it?” and “how do I apply what I know to
solve it?” It works well since I know what they need and provide them
the step to come to the answer
Understanding the concept of the learning styles
will help to save time and help the group study effectively.
Tips: In the first few workshops, try to
figure out how many learning styles you have in your group. In a
basic general chemistry course we most often have two styles,
Assimilators and Convergers. Students basically are divided into two
groups: 1) they need to know the concept and theory well before
starting solving problems; 2) they can only study one theory and
expand what they know into solving many other problems. But it
doesn’t mean that we can not have other students who are interested
in answering the other questions like “Why” or “What if”. In these
cases, it might be harder for leaders to help them.
If leaders have a lot of learning styles in workshop, the best way is
trying to go through the whole four steps of the learning cycle but
it might vary, depending on the lesson. For example, if we are
dealing with acid-base titration which needs more of calculation then
conceptualization, we should expect to expand the question “How
can..” more then the question ”What?”. On the contrary, if we are
dealing with atomic structure, obviously conceptualization is more
important. Or in some other cases that we can easily make connection
with application into real life or industry or expect some things
happen, we should expand the question “What if” etc…
Juan Jose Villar
Topic: How can a junior leader help the
transition from storming to performing in a workshop?
Tip: Find a junior leader quickly and use
him/her from the beginning of workshop to help guide students.
Kevin
Wallenstein
Topic: Does stating assumptions prevent single
loop learning in group problem solving?
People always get stuck in ruts and circular
loops due to bad assumptions in workshop so preventing single-loop
learning would prevent this. I used Argyris and Schon’s theory of
single and double-loop learning; in workshop we should prevent single
loop learning and encourage double-loop learning to help prevent
circular logic and wrong answers while problem-solving.
Tip: Get students into the habit of
stating, checking and questioning assumptions before, during and
after problem-solving.