Fall 2015 Math 32404: Advanced Calculus II
Course Meeting:MoWe 4:00PM - 5:40PM, NAC 6/327
Class Number 82322
Instructor: Alice Medvedev
Office: 6278 NAC
Office Hours: Monday and Wednesday 3pm-4pm
E-mail: amedvedev at ccny
New calendar of the rest of the semester
Our final exam is 3:30-5:45pm on Monday, December 21st in our usual room
Problem sets and reading exercises.
- Problem Set 0, due Wednesday, September 2nd at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 1, due Wednesday, September 9th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 1, due Monday, September 21st at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 2, due Monday, September 28th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 2, due Wednesday, October 8th at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 3, due Wednesday, October 14th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 3, due Wednesday, October 21st at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 4, due Monday, October 26th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 4, due Wednesday, November 4th at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 5, due Monday, November 16th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 5, due Monday, November 23rd at the beginning of class.
- Reading exercises 6, due Monday, November 30th at the beginning of class.
- Problem Set 6, due Wednesday, December 9th at the beginning of class.
The required text for this course is The Elements of Real Analysis, Second Edition by Robert G. Bartle; I will follow it very closely.
The two editions of this book are quite different; make sure you have the 1976 edition; the preface should be dated "23 June 1975." New copies of this book are quite expensive; googling title and author is likely to turn up much cheaper used copies. The book is also on 2-hour reserve in the library on the 2nd floor of NAC.
Chapters 1-7 contain material that you should already know; we may review some of those topics as necessary.
I expect to cover Chapters 8-12; 14-17; 20-24.1; and 39-41. Time permitting, we may cover one or two additional topics, such as optimization or integration or.
Basic Structure of the course
The first two classes, August 31st and September 2nd, will be devoted to organization, review of delta-epsilon proofs, and some multivariable precalculus. After that, material will be broken up into four-class chunks, and here is what we'll do with each chunk:
- You will have at least 5 days to read about 30 pages from the textbook on your own and work out some simple exercises. A very short quiz containing one of those exercises, or something very much like it, will be given on the day the reading is due.
- We'll spend two to three classes going over the harder parts of this material and solving problems.
- You will have a little over a week to work on the problem set, due at the beginning of the fourth class.
- During the fourth class, we may go over some of the homework problems, answer any remaining questions, and otherwise review the material. This class will end with a half-hour test, containing new problems, similar in difficulty to the easier ones from the problem set.
Collaboration, references, and not plagiarizing
I strongly encourage you to study with other students from this class and to find 3-dimensional graphing software that you are comfortable with (for example, there are many free online options). Many students find it helpful to look at other textbooks and other online resources.
When you work together on problem sets, you should write your solutions yourself and acknowledge that you have worked together, i.e. write on the solutions you hand in "I worked with Jane Lee on problem 3, and with Jose Rodriguez on problems 2 and 4." Similarly, if you use any sources other than the textbook for the course, give a traceable reference to your source(s); "wikipedia" or "a theorem in a number theory book" is not traceable; "the wikipedia page for Equivalence_relation" and "Theorem 3.7 on p.54 of Burton's Elementary Number Theory" are traceable. Failing to do these things is called plagiarism, a form of cheating. Cheating is taken very seriously in US colleges. If I find plagiarism in your problem sets, you will receive no credit and no feedback on problem sets for the rest of the semester.
Assignments and grading
If it helps your grade, the average of your reading quizzes will be averaged in with your final exam.
- 40% of your grade will come from the final exam, 3:30-5:45 on Monday, December 21st in our usual room .
- 30% of your grade will come from the 6 in-class tests, on September 21, October 7 and 21, November 4 and 18, and December 2.
If you cannot make any of these, let me know as soon as possible!
- 30% of your grade will come from the 6 problem sets. These are due at the beginning of class; solutions turned in after 4:05pm will receive half credit.
I will grade 2-3 problems on each of the problem sets; you will also have the opportunity to get more feedback by participating in peer review.
What is a proof?
Many of the problems in this course will ask you to "prove" something, that is, to give a convincing explanation of why this something is true. At best, your proofs should look like the ones in your textbook. In particular:
The point of the proof is not to demonstrate to the grader that you understand the ideas in the problem, but to explain the solution to someone else in the class who has not thought about this particular question, and to whom you can only write, not speak. In particular, what I write on the board during lecture does not constitute written proofs - it is quite meaningless without the things I say!
- Proofs are made of complete, grammatically correct sentences.
- All variables that appear in the proof either appear in the statement being proved, or are clearly introduced somewhere in the proof with a "let".
- Each statement either clearly, logically follows from previous statements (and that logic is explained), or is introduced with an explicit purpose (e.g. "suppose towards contradiction that..." or "the inductive hypothesis is...")
- Anything that is not proved is cited, by its common name (e.g. the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic) or by reference to our textbook (e.g. Proposition 4 on p. 10) or to another source.
Etiquette and Attitude.
These are things that most professors take for granted; some are more obvious than others; some are more important than others; many are equally standard outside academia.
Communication. Written communication, such as emails, begins with a greeting, probably addressing the recipient, and ends with a signature, probably including the full name of the writer. You have no idea how much some professors are offended by informalities such as "Hey," and "See ya."
It is reasonable to expect emails to be answered within a day or two; it is unreasonable to expect an answer within an hour. The truly urgent questions (where's the final exam - i'm already late?) are better answered by google or a phone call to the relevant university office. Some questions that feel urgent (did I pass the class?) simply require patience.
Email is great for logistics: finding a time to talk outside regular office hours, making special arrangements for missed work, telling me about a problem with the web page or a homework, etc. Email does not work well for discussing mathematics - come to my office hours instead.
If a professor (or, really anyone else!) agrees to meet with you personally, outside of lecture and standard office hours, and then you find out that you will not make it to the meeting, you should inform the professor of this at least several hours in advance. I have had enough problems with this issue that I will take 1 percentage point off your grade for each missed appointment.
Responsibility. On the most basic level, it is your responsibility to know about all assignments and deadlines and to show up for exams, and to make any special arrangements necessary, from arranging time to meet outside office hours to knowing when your drop deadline is.
You are also responsible for your learning, from knowing what material has been covered to making sure you understand that material. The lectures will not cover everything; the problem sets will not cover everything; the textbook is the closest to covering everything. You will certainly have to learn some things on your own, either from the textbook or really on your own. Some of the material this course covers is genuinely difficult: you will probably not get it on the first try; that's ok. To maximize the number of tries, read the textbook before the lecture, noting the parts you don't understand; then come to lecture and pay special attention to those parts and ask lots of questions; then read through the book again and you will discover new subtleties you don't quite get. Come to office hours to clear up those, work on the homework, come to more office hours, read comments on graded homework, and read through the text one more time. By this point, two or three weeks after meeting the concept for the first time, you should be comfortable with it. The bottom line is, your job is to acquire knowledge, not simply to follow my instructions. This course is graded on accomplishment, not effort.
Lectures. Attendance is not mandatory but strongly recommended. Most of the material covered in lecture is in the textbook (though sometimes in much less detail), and most of the announcements will eventually be posted on this course webpage. However, you are responsible for the exceptions, so if you miss a class, talk to someone who didn't. You will also find the class much much harder if you do not come to lecture; in my experience on both sides of the game, missing more than half of the lectures will cost you about two letter grades.
The best use of lecture is to focus all of your attention on it, for the entire duration. If you are not doing this, please do not disturb the people who do. If you come late or leave early, sit near the door and don't let the door slam. If you're eating, please don't be loud or smelly (if you bring hot pizza, bring enough for everyone!). Whether or not you're playing with your cell phone, make sure it's silent.
I have had enough problems with this issue that I will take 1 percentage point off your grade for each time your phone rings during class.
Basically, if it's distracting, don't do it. Common sense, right?
The best way to stay focused in class is to get involved. If something doesn't quite make sense, ask about it! I like questions! I like stupid questions, too - for every brave soul willing to ask one, there's ten shy confused students thinking the same thing.
If you think there's a typo on the board, you may well be right - ask about it! Sometimes, I'll make them on purpose, to keep you on your toes. Other times, I'll make honest mistakes - I'm not perfect. And if it's not a typo, your confusion will not get cleared up if you don't ask. Clearing up confusions is what this is all about.
Scholarship. Whatever you do with the rest of your life, in this course you are acting as a mathematics scholar, grappling with ideas that are new and confusing to you. Thus, your natural state is confusion: the moment you understand something, you move on to the next topic. Progress is measured by being confused about different ideas over time.
So, what do you do with a confusing definition or theorem or proof? First, you make sure you understand each word and symbol that appears in it. The "appear in" partial order is well-founded, so induction works. Then you try to think of explicit examples. For a definition, look for things that satisfy it, as well as for things that don't. For a theorem, look for an example that satisfies the hypothesis and see that it satisfies the conclusion, and then for some examples that don't satisfy the conclusion and see which hypotheses they fail. Similarly, to understand a proof, it is often helpful to go through it with a specific example in hand; a non-example that fails some of the hypotheses will make it easier to see where the proof needs those hypotheses, i.e. breaks without them. The best way to understand a proof is to completely forget it and then try to prove the result yourself; this is also the slowest way. The next step is to ask why this particular definition was chosen, or why the theorem was stated in this particular way. Varying a definition, you may find equivalent definitions, stupid definitions, or new interesting concepts. Varying a theorem, you will find many false statements, some true generalizations, and occasionally an entirely new result.
This is what us mathematicians do when we aren't teaching.
Writing. This is a writing-intensive course. Almost all problems on homeworks and exams require explanation and justification; these should be written out in words, in complete sentences. Ideally, your writing should closely resemble the proofs and examples in our textbook.
Cheating. Please don't. If you are writing down ideas somebody else told you and not mentioning this fact, you are cheating. If you are writing down words somebody told you, and you could not rewrite the solution in different words or explain it to another student in the class, you are cheating. Rules around exams are not arbitrary hurdles I place in your way. They are something like arms-control deals amongst the students in the course: you really don't want infinite-time open-everything take-home exams, because those require, well, infinite time and access to everything.
Letters. If you need a letter of reference of some sort, make sure to ask for it long long in advance: at least a month before any deadlines, and in any case no later than mid-November.
Course Learning Outcomes for this course.
Appropriate academic accommodations are offered to students with disabilities.
The university's policy on academic integrity.